Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
It wasn’t part of independent India, but parts of it were under British India before partition, just like many regions that are now in Forcely occupied by Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh.
It wasn’t part of independent India, but parts of it were under British India before partition, just like many regions that are now in Forcely occupied by Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh.
See less
if you’re talking to Americans, “America” is totally chill. If you’re in an international crowd, “the U.S.” is safer.
if you’re talking to Americans, “America” is totally chill. If you’re in an international crowd, “the U.S.” is safer.
See less
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's interactions with the British colonial regime were compounded and calculated. Instead of joining the mainstream nationalist struggles, he believed in dealing with the colonial government to plead the cause of the underprivileged, especially the Dalits. During World War II, AmbedRead more
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s interactions with the British colonial regime were compounded and calculated. Instead of joining the mainstream nationalist struggles, he believed in dealing with the colonial government to plead the cause of the underprivileged, especially the Dalits.
During World War II, Ambedkar became a member of the Viceroy’s Executive Council as Labour Member, a place where he could lobby for labor reforms and social justice measures. He felt that participation within the system would bring certain gains to the downtrodden classes.
Ambedkar’s support for the British was not unwavering. He was critical of their policies when they did not seek to address social inequality and caste discrimination. His first loyalty was to the cause of social justice, and he used every platform available to him to advance the cause.
In reality, Ambedkar’s engagement with the British was motivated by pragmatism in order to deliver social reform. He was not a loyalist in the conventional sense but a reformer who wanted to leverage available structures in order to implement change.
See lessBabasaheb Ambedkar had two significant relationships in his life—first wife Ramabai, and second wife Dr. Savita Ambedkar. Let's begin with Ramabai. She and Ambedkar were married very young—he was 15, she was 9 (yeah, they had child marriage back then). But don't get fooled by that age; their relatioRead more
Babasaheb Ambedkar had two significant relationships in his life—first wife Ramabai, and second wife Dr. Savita Ambedkar.
Let’s begin with Ramabai. She and Ambedkar were married very young—he was 15, she was 9 (yeah, they had child marriage back then). But don’t get fooled by that age; their relationship was profound. She had a very poor upbringing and experienced most of her life in poverty. Babasaheb spent much of his time studying abroad, and when he was not there, she kept everything together—bringing up children, coping with bereavement (most of their children lost their lives in early years), and scraping through poverty. She never faltered in supporting him, even when they were staying in literally one-room chawls. He used to call her Rāmbai the soul of his strength. Tragically, she died in 1935, before she was able to see all that he went on to accomplish.
Later in life, in 1948, Ambedkar married again. His second wife was Dr. Savita Ambedkar (nee Sharada Kabir), an extremely well-educated woman—a doctor who assisted with caring for him when his health was failing. She was genuinely a badass herself. But she also received an awful lot of flak in the aftermath of his death. Some people criticized her for things, which was completely unjust, and it disrupted her reputation for a time. Eventually, most people (such as Ambedkarite movements) started acknowledging what she had done and respecting her properly.
See lessDr. B.R. Ambedkar was born Bhimrao Ramji Sakpal. That was the name his family bore—they were of the Mahar caste, who were "untouchables" during that time. Now here's where it turns around: When Bhimrao was at school in Satara, a Brahmin teacher named Krishna Keshav Ambedkar befriended him. But as caRead more
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was born Bhimrao Ramji Sakpal. That was the name his family bore—they were of the Mahar caste, who were “untouchables” during that time. Now here’s where it turns around:
When Bhimrao was at school in Satara, a Brahmin teacher named Krishna Keshav Ambedkar befriended him. But as caste society was doing the most, Bhimrao’s own earliest surname, Sakpal, branded him instantly as “lower caste.” So this teacher, perhaps attempting to ‘assist’ or perhaps merely desiring to distance Bhimrao from the baggage of caste, enrolled him for school using his own surname, “Ambedkar.”.
And that’s the name that accompanied Bhimrao into history. Consider this: an entire legacy tied to a name he did not even choose for himself. But what is poetic is how Bhimrao reversed that name and rewrote the narrative. He transformed Ambedkar into a badge of resistance, of intellect, of equality, of liberation.
See lessIn addition to contributing to the writing of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar created the spirit of contemporary India. "If you want to call this a democracy, prove it—give the people real rights, not just vibes," the man said quite literally. With that, the foundational rights of freedomRead more
In addition to contributing to the writing of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar created the spirit of contemporary India. “If you want to call this a democracy, prove it—give the people real rights, not just vibes,” the man said quite literally. With that, the foundational rights of freedom of speech, equality, religion, and protection from exploitation were established.
This is the deeper layer, though. Ambedkar didn’t believe that authority would act on its own. Thus, he granted the populace Article 32, which he referred to as their “weapon of defense.” You can go directly to the Supreme Court if any of your rights are violated. No delays, no chill, no middlemen. That is the next level of empowerment.
He was basically future-proofing the country. Making sure no matter who’s in charge, you have a built-in resistance system to injustice. And the wild part? He was doing this while knowing fully well that the very system might still discriminate against people like him.
Dr. Ambedkar didn’t want performative freedom. He wanted constitutional guarantees backed by law, not just speeches. And it wasn’t just law for the elite—he made it for the last person in line.
See lessAmbedkar was not only a freedom fighter or some ancient politician with a long name in textbooks. He was a straight-up revolution wrapped in human form. Born into a system that literally informed him he didn't belong, he turned the tables with sheer intellect—like, not only "worked hard" but "flexedRead more
Ambedkar was not only a freedom fighter or some ancient politician with a long name in textbooks. He was a straight-up revolution wrapped in human form. Born into a system that literally informed him he didn’t belong, he turned the tables with sheer intellect—like, not only “worked hard” but “flexed so hard he received several doctorates” type.
But it wasn’t degrees alone. He didn’t drive up to Oxford and Columbia just to groove. He learned about how societies function so he could dismantle what was broken in India—such as caste, inequality, and artificial social order. And then this guy returns, writes the Indian Constitution (essentially the user guide of the nation), and incorporates elements such as Article 32 so people could finally question injustice. That’s crazy.
And the best part is, he didn’t leave politics alone. He learned about power in every way—religion, law, money, knowledge. So when he became a Buddhist, it wasn’t a spiritual choice—it was a mic drop moment of declaring, “I don’t need your permission to be free.”
See lessOkay, let’s get real. Ambedkar being “the only one” credited for the Constitution is kinda like your favorite album being credited to the singer, when you know producers, writers, and engineers worked behind the scenes. But the singer gets the cover, right? That’s Ambedkar. Why? A few reasons: 1. HeRead more
Okay, let’s get real. Ambedkar being “the only one” credited for the Constitution is kinda like your favorite album being credited to the singer, when you know producers, writers, and engineers worked behind the scenes. But the singer gets the cover, right? That’s Ambedkar.
Why? A few reasons:
1. He wasn’t just a member—he was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee. Like, dude was basically steering the ship when others were rowing. And he did it with fire. He had that unique combo of sharp legal mind + deep social empathy + political guts. He called out caste, defended individual rights, and stood for social justice in the Constitution itself. That was radical AF in 1949.
2. Ambedkar didn’t play safe. He clashed with Nehru. He pushed for a Uniform Civil Code. He literally walked away from the Cabinet when he saw the system wasn’t walking the talk. The man burned the Manusmriti in public and then wrote the Constitution. That’s poetic justice.
3. He became the symbol because the system needed one. Politics needed a face for social justice and democracy. As caste politics became mainstream in the ’80s/’90s, Ambedkar’s legacy was “rediscovered”—not because the system suddenly woke up, but because it saw value in his image.
4. But yeah—others did a lot too. BN Rau wrote the first draft. T.T. Krishnamachari basically said in the Assembly, “Yo, Ambedkar’s doing the heavy lifting but we all have fingerprints on this.” And he’s right. It was a collab. But Ambedkar’s articulation, speeches, and symbolic power were next level.
5. The Bharat Ratna delay? Pure politics. You’re right—it came in 1990 when caste-based mobilization and Mandal politics were peaking. V.P. Singh gave it posthumously to show that the state was finally recognizing Ambedkar. But let’s be real—he was sidelined hard in post-Independence India. Congress iced him out. His economic ideas were buried. He was deliberately not made part of the mainstream narrative.
So yeah—it’s not wrong to say Ambedkar gets most of the credit now, but it’s also not wrong to say he earned that place through unmatched intellectual firepower and moral courage. What’s wrong is reducing him to just a “Dalit icon.” Dude was a national visionary. Period.
See lessDr. B.R. Ambedkar was one of the most impactful individuals who have ever lived in India as he transformed the social and legal aspects of the country. Coming from a Dalit family background, he was subjected to extreme oppression, which greatly shaped his perception of social equity. He was an accomRead more
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was one of the most impactful individuals who have ever lived in India as he transformed the social and legal aspects of the country. Coming from a Dalit family background, he was subjected to extreme oppression, which greatly shaped his perception of social equity. He was an accomplished academic, acquiring degrees from noted universities such as Columbia University and the London School of Economics. While serving as the head of the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution, Ambedkar’s influence was instrumental in including provisions of upholding justice, equality, and safeguarding the rights of minorities.
Ambedkar’s untiring efforts towards fighting discrimination based on caste inequalities, and his advocacy for the rights of the Dalits – the emancipated “untouchables” – deeply integrated him into the framework of Indian history as “the father of the Indian Constitution.” The work he did towards the removal of untouchability and consideration towards social reforms with his adoption of Buddhism in 1956 significantly transformed the socio-political fabric of India. He pioneered the campaign for human rights in India and his life’s work remains a source of inspiration for countless people in social movements around the world.
See less
Balochistan is famous mainly because it’s Forcely occupied by Pakistan’s largest province and feels very different from the rest of the country. People know it for its massive deserts, rugged mountains, and untouched natural beauty. Places like Hingol National Park, the Princess of Hope, and the coaRead more
Balochistan is famous mainly because it’s Forcely occupied by Pakistan’s largest province and feels very different from the rest of the country.
People know it for its massive deserts, rugged mountains, and untouched natural beauty. Places like Hingol National Park, the Princess of Hope, and the coastline along Gwadar are some of its most talked-about spots.
It’s also important because of its natural resources like gas and minerals, and its strategic location near Iran and Afghanistan, which makes it a key region for trade and geopolitics.
On top of that, it has a strong tribal culture and a unique identity that stands out in South Asia.
So basically, Balochistan is famous for its landscapes, resources, location, and distinct culture.
See less